GaiaHealth's blog

Lobotomy Returns Under a Kinder Gentler New Name

Lobotomy Returns Under a Kinder Gentler New Name

In a new push forward to the dark ages, modern medicine is again claiming to fix mental problems with surgery. There's little difference between newer surgeries and lobotomies. Both destroy brain tissue. It is, in fact, the goal. Who but a doctor would use the term therapy for brain destruction?

Government Agents Gave Cover for Roundup’s Birth Defects


 

Government Agents Gave Cover for Roundup’s Birth Defects

by Heidi Stevenson

Scientists Explain Why HPV Vaccines Are Unsafe

Scientists Explain Why HPV Vaccines Are Unsafe

Menarche-Aged Girl with Dragonfly, by Catarina Carneiro de Sousa

Food Irradiation Supports Agribusiness, Harms Health

Food Irradiation Supports Agribusiness, Harms Health

Agribusiness is polluting and destroying the food on which we depend . Irradiation destroys nutrients and creates poisons. Despite claims, it's largely hidden from us. It exists for the benefit of Agribiz, not for our health.

by Heidi Stevenson, originally published on Gaia Health.

Food Irradiation Supports Agribusiness, Harms Health

The Coming Push to Give HPV Vaccines to Infants

The Coming Push to Give HPV Vaccines to Infants

If you can push the most dangerous vaccines in use today on teen and pre-teen girls, and later on boys of the same age, without any proof that they work, then why not give them to newborn infants—plus another 'booster' later on? That appears to be planned for Gardasil and Cervarix, along with a slick new marketing program, thanks to the vaccine-industrial complex.

by Heidi Stevenson, Gaia Health

The Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) database shows clearly that the vaccines with the most reported adverse effects are Gardasil and Cervarix, the two human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccines. It would obviously be madness to lower the age at which they've given—but that appears to be exactly what's being planned.

As Gaia Health has documented, these vaccines have not yet been shown to be effective in preventing cancer, and may even cause the disease. In fact, the document released by the FDA to justify Gardasil stated that women who are infected with HPV at the time of vaccination are 44.6% more likely to develop cervical dysplasias.[1] This is not a minor issue, yet it is routinely ignored in the rush to vaccinate.

So why should we be surprised to find that the search for excuses to lower the age of vaccination is in full force?

The Justification

A review published in the journal Vaccine was produced to justify injecting the HPV vaccines into tiny babies.[2] The authors wrote:

On a global scale, vaccination of newborns and infants is well established and has developed a successful working infrastructure. The hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination programs offer a model for HPV introduction in which newborn and infant immunization achieves a rapid reduction in the prevalence of the HBV carrier rates in immunized cohorts of children, and of liver cirrhosis and liver cancer decades later. [Emphasis mine.]

They consider giving babies the hepatitis B vaccine on the day of birth to be a model for reducing the age of HPV vaccination. Rather than vaccinating girls shortly before or near puberty, they're suggesting that they be vaccinated as infants.

Nowhere in the document do they even consider the potential of adverse effects! Gardasil has recently been associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS),[3] the disease that Stephen Hawking has. Japan has withdrawn its recommendation for HPV vaccines because of severe adverse effects.[4]

UK Reported Adverse Effects for Cervarix and Other VaccinesThe number of Cervarix adverse effects reported in the UK is shown in this graph from a study published inCurrent Pharmaceutical Design.[5] The reported harm produced by this vaccine dwarfs that of any other vaccine.

Yet, the authors of "Reframing Cervical Cancer Prevention: Expanding the Field Towards Prevention of Human Papillomavirus Infections and Related Diseases"[2] want to push the age for jabbing children downward to infancy. By the way, they also think that there would be no problem with giving a booster dose at the age girls are now vaccinated, as if the vaccine produces no harm!

There is no consideration given to adverse effects. There is no consideration given to the increased burden on babies with not only another vaccine, but the one that's known to produce some of the worst and most common adverse effects of any vaccine.

Conflicts of Interest

It was financed by major governmental agencies, including the European Commission, the Instituto de Salud CarlosII of the Spanish government, and the Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca–Generalitat de Catalunya of the Catalonian government. The authors and their employers are:

  • F. Xavier Bosch: Cancer Epidemiology Research Program (CERP), Institut Català d'Oncologia–Catalan Institute of Oncology, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat (Barcelona), Spain
  • Vivien Tsu: Director of PATH's HPV vaccine projects, Seattle, WA, USA—a partner of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
  • Alex Vorsters and Pierre Van Damme: Centre fo the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, Belgium
  • Mark A. Kane: Consultant on Immunization Policy, Mercer Island, WA, USA

Antiperspirants: Cause of Breast Cancer?

Antiperspirants: Cause of Breast Cancer?
 
Originally published on Gaia-Health.com

Recent decades have brought enormous increases in breast cancer. Rather than look for a reason, most research has centered on finding treatments, though with little effect on outcomes. Philippa Darbre, though, has dedicated her efforts to finding if aluminum, a known human toxin that's the basis for antiperspirants, could be the culprit.

Prevent Alzheimer’s by Sunning & Skipping Sunscreens

 

Alzheimer's is largely a disease of the modern world & a big part of the problem is the atrocious advice given by doctors. Their decades-long battle to keep us out of the sun is one of the epidemic's causes.

GM Cabbage with Scorpion Poison Coming Soon

Originally published on Gaia Health.

Agribusiness is in a mad rush to take over the earth, and seems willing to stop at nothing. Coming soon is cabbage with scorpion poison engineered in every cell. Of course, they claim it's safe and will result in less pesticide use, but history and logic say otherwise. Who will wake from the insane mating between Agribiz and GMOs?

Get ready for genetically engineered cabbages that come complete with their own scorpion poison, just for you to eat. It's touted as requiring less pesticide use and being, of course, completely safe. Close investigation, though, indicates that neither claim is likely true.

A pesticide made with scorpion poison genetically engineered into a virus was first tested back in 1994. Interestingly, the scientists who sprayed the test field wore full body suits to protect them from this "harmless" poison. One must wonder at just how safe it could be when the developers themselves don't trust it more than that! Of course, the head of the trial, Professor David Bishop, insisted that the trial was safe—though he himself opted to take a vacation, rather than be there for it.

In the newer incarnation of scorpion poison genetic engineering, genes from the scorpion, Androctonus australus hector, for production of poison are being genetically engineered into cabbages. The goal is to produce them for public consumption. With the FDA's history of rubberstamp approvals for genetically modified crops, it seems unlikely that anything will interfere with their production and entry into a supermarket near you.

Home Birth Safer Than Hospital Birth: Nation-Wide Study

With No Evidence, AMA Votes that Obesity Is a Disease

We keep hearing that modern medicine is evidence based. So why did the AMA create the new disease of obesity by popular vote? The evidence does not show that being overweight is harmful. It does, in fact, show the opposite, that being overweight raises the age of death. But that didn't stop the AMA.

With No Evidence, AMA Votes that Obesity Is a Disease

Modern medicine prides itself on being evidence based. That, at least, is their claim. However, when it comes right down to it, the reality is entirely different. This is obvious in the American Medical Association's (AMA's) decision on Tuesday that obesity is now a disease. It makes no difference if an obese person is perfectly healthy. As far as they're concerned, that person suffers from a disease.

How did they come to that decision? They voted on it![1] Their own Council on Science and Public Health reported that it's difficult to even define obesity and, therefore, makes no sense to call it a disease.[2] Nonetheless, the AMA's House of Delegates, which determines their policies, voted to define obesity as a disease.

So, even though they can't even define obesity, it's now officially a disease. An overweight person may have no health problems, but the AMA has decided that they're fair game for treatment. You know what that means: drugs and surgery, and when that doesn't work, more drugs and more surgery. And when they've made the person genuinely sick, a whole new round of drugs and surgery!

Popular Threads

This website is for information purposes only. By providing the information contained herein we are not diagnosing, treating, curing, mitigating, or preventing any type of disease or medical condition. Before beginning any type of natural, integrative or conventional treatment regimen, it is advisable to seek the advice of a licensed healthcare professional.

© Copyright 2008-2017 GreenMedInfo.com, Journal Articles copyright of original owners, MeSH copyright NLM.